He told me that it had nothing at all to do with seeing nipples. If they are topless and even wearing a coat that's open that covers their breasts it MUST still be censored. Same thing for no bottoms. Even if sitting sideways or hands or what ever covering the prize. They are considered NUDE and it MUST be censored. That's just what he told me. And he's censored plenty of mine and sent me the warnings when he has to prove it. He just censored this one a few days ago and you see less in it then in the Britney pics.
I have to agree with him on this one guys. That's the rule that Sam PMed me himself. One time, I got a little upset about certain images being censored, and said some shitty things, and eventually Sam stepped in and explained the whole deal to me. Unfortunately, the rule on censoring images is very strict. Even if anything is hardly showing, an image can still be censored, which I of course think is bullshit, but that's not really the point. The point is that I believe carey to be correct in this matter. It's just how I feel.
Wow, this entire thread is full of pompous ignoramuses. The swearing isn't welcome, the hating isn't welcome. A good point was made, there is no need to get angry. Those pics should be censored. Those are the rules. No need to fight when someone was just trying to follow the guidelines set down by those who pay for this site to run. Oh and note how I didn't swear once, and that I didn't spell any words wrong. Oh an I also capitalized my sentences, used grammar that, if not perfect, comes close to it, and I still managed to prove my point.
